Peer Review Process

All submissions to JUKES: Jurnal Kesehatan Wira Buana undergo a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review by at least two independent expert reviewers.

  1. Preliminary Screening: Scope evaluation, author guideline adherence, and Turnitin similarity verification (≤ 20%).
  2. Expert Peer Review: Independent, anonymized evaluation of scientific novelty, methodological rigor, and data interpretation.
  3. Editorial Decision: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, or Decline (standard turnaround: 3–6 weeks).

Peer Review: 

1. Esti Rahayu, S.Tr. Keb., Bdn., M.Keb.

(Google Scholar; Sinta ID: 6805915); Universitas Wira Buana, Lampung, Indonesia

 2. Evilia Nur Savitri, S.Tr. Keb., M.Keb.

(Google Scholar; Sinta ID: 7015565); Universitas Wira Buana, Lampung, Indonesia

 3. Catur Setyorini, SST., M.Kes., M.Keb.

(Google Scholar; Sinta Id : 6674307 ) STIKes Mamba'ul Ulum Surakarta, Indonesia

4. Bdn. Sumi Anggraeni, M.Keb

(Google Scholar;Sinta id : 6668242) Universitas Muhammadiyah Pringsewu Lampung, Indonesia

5. Sutriningsih, S.ST., M.Keb.

(Google Scholar; Sinta ID: 6735609); STIKES Adila Lampung, Indonesia